Wednesday, November 2, 2011

Boss of intermediary of Jiangsu Xuzhou house property is sucked illegally store 680 thousand hind be missing

Sun Dong of Wu Hailin of reporter of our newspaper of Ding Guofeng of our newspaper reporter spends Jiangsu to save Cai Mou of boss of intermediary of Xuzhou city some house property to release advertisement through different channel, with annual interest 20% it is bait to the accrual of 60% , attract other to entrust loan, 9 short citizen capital is absorbed to add up to in all inside the month 680 thousand multivariate, escape toward the other place subsequently. On October 11 morning, court of people of division of Xuzhou city drum-tower undertakes publicity adjudging to this case, with absorbing the public illegally deposit blame sentences Cai Mou set term of imprisonment 3 years. " legal daily " the reporter interviews discovery, the backside of this case exposes the random elephant that gives current estate intermediary. "I will report a case to the security authorities. Cai Mou cheated me 170 thousand yuan, the other side before half an year did not see sign. " last year on June 17 morning 9 when make, qu Nv person will to group of detect of classics of substation of drum-tower public security report a case to the security authorities. Bend a lady to mirror, in April 2009, she sees on small advertisement into the coronal investment develops limited company conduct propaganda to say, this company is put external borrow, be badly in need of inducting capital, pay high specified number interest rate to client. Inside the chain store that she runs to door of Shandong of dragon of cloud of the other side, negotiate loan arrangements. Qu Nv person says, she put 30 thousand yuan in that, divide 4 times again subsequently lend this intermediary the company 140 thousand yuan of money, the other side left to entrust contract and sheet of receipt for a loan to her. "Annual interest basically is more 50% , the part is 60% . " she says. The policeman asks whether she took the interest of promise of the other side, she says money was not taken one minute. Subsequently, drum-tower police receives a citizen to sign up for counter scale again and again, they by " the investment that become a hat " deceit, not only the money that lends the other side has go notting have time, and company boss also at half an year before " the world evaporated " . On December 14, 2010, police seizes Cai Mou in city of Fujian Province Xiamen. Cai Mou of 29 years old is explained, 2008 the beginning of the year, he issued form sediment road to register the investment that become a hat to expand limited company in Xuzhou city with his name, become a house technically buying and selling and the business that rent. Worked period of time, the business is cool, have no way out. 2009 the beginning of the year, also did not do house property business again. "I see put borrow money earns, draw deposit with the name of the company. " he says, below the accredit that does not have financial management department and license, his do sth without authorization contracts to do a job suck store business, signed loan contract with much person early or late, conventional loan interest presses monthly interest 5 calculate to 6 minutes, borrowed in all 680 thousand multivariate. His much go off with puts these fund borrow, one part makes investment, one part was used at oneself to consume. Later, he gives off the cash portion that go to close not to come back, the other item of investment is successional also deficit, he cannot pay the interest that draws client deposit finally, facilitate ran to Xiamen in October 2009. Cai Mou says, the capital of client was not returned one minute, paid a part the interest of promise only. The court thinks via cognizance, cai Mou of the accused person is approved without Chinese people bank, to the society not specific target draws fund, issue a certificate, acceptance repays captital with interest inside proper time, its behavior is belonged to admit public deposit activity illegally, disobey national finance to manage code, draw public fund illegally, disturbed financial order, enroach on the interest of other, cause abominable social effect, its behavior offended criminal law the 176th regulation, guilty fact is clear, evidence is really sufficient, ought to investigate its criminal duty with admitting public deposit guilt illegally. The guilty fact that states oneself is offerred according to the facts after be being brought to justice in view of Cai Mou, give light punishment. Reason court makes afore-mentioned court decisions lawfully. Our newspaper Xuzhou on October 11 report